AI-native entrants are quoting $25K for work you price at $50K–$150K. They are faster. They are not more accurate. But your clients cannot tell the difference from an RFP.
The CROs that lead will be the ones that can prove their methodology is AI-verified, independently validated, and audit-ready. The ones that cannot will compete on price.
Head-to-head comparison against expert human reviewers. These are your numbers now.
30,150 documents screened · 20,476 data points extracted · 5 diverse domains · When AI and human disagree, AI is correct 59% of the time.
Read the full study →Your client’s screening decisions independently verified against their PICOS criteria. Every flagged discrepancy comes with source citations.
Every extracted data point cross-checked against source PDFs. Your clients see the verification before HTA agencies do.
Model logic, parameter inputs, and sensitivity analyses verified against the source evidence base. The kind of QC that wins repeat business.
Typical turnaround: 48 hours. We have processed 23,000-record reviews in under an hour.
Pioneer CROs co-author validation studies with our team. Your methodology + our AI verification = publishable results in ISPOR, Nature, and domain journals.
Position your CRO as the AI-forward choice — backed by peer-reviewed evidence, not marketing claims.
One verification proves the model. Send us your next completed SLR and see the discrepancy report. Then decide how to integrate.